October 28 2012

 FD Editor’s Note:  Before you feel too sympathetic let’s remind ourselves about what happened and why this soldier is in prison.  He murdered an unarmed detainee in cold blood, while he was supposed to be releasing him back to his home.  Read this excerpt, below that is the news article Also read these.

Behenna sought a commission in the United States Army after graduating from college. He attended OCS and Infantry Officer Training and was then selected to attend the U. S. Army’s Ranger School. Behenna was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division as the platoon leader for 5th Platoon, Delta Company of the 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment and deployed to Iraq in 2007.

During his tour of duty in Iraq, Behenna’s platoon conducted counter-insurgency operations in the Salahuddin province with a focus on the towns of Mezra, Hajaj and Butoma. Behenna made efforts to develop ties with local Iraqis as part of his counter-insurgency mission and, already fluent in Spanish, began to teach himself Arabic. He was known to host cookouts with his platoon for local interpreters, engage with civilians on the street and encouraged his soldiers to learn about Iraqi culture and to eat their food. This desire to interact with locals caused some friction within his platoon with one soldier commenting: “He would talk to random civilians, anyone. He was the type of guy that liked Iraqis. That was the only annoying thing about him. He was always about saving the country.”

On the 21st of April, 2008, Behenna’s platoon was returning to their base with two detainees when their convoy was hit by an IED. One of the platoon’s MRAPs was destroyed and two soldiers, Specialists Adam Kohlhaas and Steven Christofferson, were killed and several others grievously wounded. The loss of his men weighed heavily on Behenna who at one point broke down in tears over the incident during a group therapy session.

Continues…

Send to Kindle
 

Was the decision to block the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the US where he faced computer hacking charges correct? Here’s my opinion.

This week Theresa May declared that she wouldn’t allow the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the US where he:

stands accused of hacking into the Pentagon and Nasa in his hunt for “little green men”.

 The Home Secretary said she had taken the decision on human rights grounds:

As he suffers from Asperger’s and is a suicide risk, Gary had his extradition blocked using the human rights convention, which says that no one shall be subjected to “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”.

I for one welcomed this decision however hypocritical May was by invoking the Human Rights Acts. Also, as written by Shami Chakrabarti in a piece in the Guardian:

May didn’t employ the same compassion for Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan, extradited to the US earlier this month.

Of course, the USA didn’t react to the news very well which is regrettable but:

.. it is well known that the US was remark­ably coy about extra­dit­ing IRA sus­pects back to the UK to stand trial dur­ing the 30-year “Troubles” in North­ern Ire­land.  We even have well-known apo­lo­gists such as Con­gress­man Peter King, the Chair­man of the Home­land Secur­ity Com­mit­tee attempt­ing to demon­ise organ­isa­tions like Wikileaks as ter­ror­ist organ­isa­tions, while at the same being a life-long sup­porter of Sinn Féin, the polit­ical wing of the Pro­vi­sional IRA.

So is this a case of double-standards being applied? For me, McKinnon isn’t a terrorist mastermind so is there any justification for treating him as such and pursuing him for the last 10+ years. I think May’s decision didn’t try to seek popular approval it just demonstrated a degree of common sense practicality, realism and empathy.

What do you think? Was this the right decision? Leave a comment HERE

Source

Send to Kindle

A “non-compliant” detainee is escorted by guards after showering inside the US military prison for “enemy combatants” in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (AFP Photo / John Moore)

Whistleblowing website WikiLeaks is releasing over 100 classified documents detailing US Department of Defense procedures for running Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, Camp Bucca and other infamous prisons where terror suspects are detained.

The directives and manuals, which for more than a decade directed the US military’s policy for treatment of its detainees, will be released chronologically over the next month, WikiLeaks said in a statement.

The first batch of the documents released is the 2002 Camp Delta – Guantanamo Bay prison – Standing Operating Procedure manuals.

“This document is of significant historical importance. Guantanamo Bay has become the symbol for systematized human rights abuse in the West with good reason,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said.

Several of the documents slated for publishing “can only be described as ’policies of unaccountability,’” WikiLeaks said in its press release.

One document such document that has been previewed but not yet published is the ’Policy on Assigning Detainee Internment Serial Numbers’. Wikileaks claims it is a manual on how to “disappear” sensitive prisoners “by systematically holding off from assigning a prisoner record numbers”.

Another apparently contains the notorious instructions to “purge” interrogations tapes, which became notorious following the Abu Ghraib torture scandals in the mid 2000s. WikiLeaks called on NGOs, activists and the general public to thoroughly read the documents to gain a better understanding of the evolution of the Pentagon’s post-9/11 attitude towards prisoners.

Source

Send to Kindle
  • Donate to FreeDetainees!

  • Categories

  • Write your Reps!

  • Recent

  • Archives

 

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.

Switch to our mobile site